PURPLE BANS FRED NORRIS II FOR BULLSH*T

hamneggs · May 28, 2003

Patrick McIrish quote in part (speaking to Fred Norris): <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR> From this day forward even the mods have said you will be judged from what you do here on out. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> Link

RPM BANS HIM FOR bullshit

Fred's second to last post:

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Somehow I figure that this perk will never come into play. Just a hunch. Kinda like the hunch you have when a guy raises you and looks as disinterested in the pot as Richard Simmons would if he walked into the Playboy Mansion.

Pat- I'm sure you have been at tables where the guy who talks the most is usually the first to call for chips. As in life-Talk is cheap. Only the outcome will prove whether you can backup your bravado. I only wish I could engage in knocking you down a peg or two.

Poker Babe- Since nobody here is willing to ask the burning and most pertinent questions let me be the first. Nothing to do with your playing skills or your demeanor. How big is your rack? Are the funbags real or implants. Shaved or unshaved? Now be honest. The answers that you give will determine whether I believe you or not when you are trying to steal a pot or two. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Fred's last post:

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Uncle-

Just stating what I feel. As always I will not let my position be compromised by censorship, stupidity, personal conflicts or agendas. No need to be ambiguous with my response. I stayed and will stay out of your welcome thread as well as others with which you are involved. My dislike for you is well known. Your feelings towards me have been duly noted as well. If you're such a standup guy that all profess you to be, then you will understand where I am coming from and let the chips fall where they may. I made a promise to Patrick and my word is golden. My feelings towards you will not alter that promise, although I believe that they are warranted. The trump card that you have and will always hold is an unfair advantage. The ban-button can be a powerful tool when given to an "attention whore". Not naming any names, but when someone is elevated to a "position of authority" many confuse their objective. Enjoy your day and maybe you could dig up a Kira Kener or two for me? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Purple, I don't know where you get this "short leash" BS.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR> fred,

i will save uncle the trouble of banning you.

you should know better than anyone you were on a short leash.

cya. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE> RPM Banning Fred Norris

RPM, that is a bullsh*t decision.

TheGeneral+ · May 28, 2003

Hammy, No reason needed to ban Fred. He is ban on site material.

If he would possibly have a legit post, he is not worthy of having it on our board.

Figured you were aware of freddy & his past.

hamneggs · May 28, 2003

General, you missed the interaction between Pat and Fred

I think that in the past you may have been right

Not this time though, there was a new leaf

And nothing that Fred said was banworthy, IMO

TheGeneral+ · May 28, 2003

My take on Fred is this. If he posts clean, i will leave it up, until he blows. But if another mod wants to clean his clock immediately, i would not blink an eye on that either.

hamneggs · May 28, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>From this day forward even the mods have said you will be judged from what you do here on out. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

and then The General says

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR> But if another mod wants to clean his clock immediately, i would not blink an eye on that either. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

So RPM goes above Pat?

Is that the hierarchy?

bartybet · May 28, 2003

who cares?....mod's will moderate and you will post...whats the big deal...

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>So RPM goes above Pat?

Is that the hierarchy? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

hasnt rpm been doing this longer?

RPM · May 28, 2003

ham,

im not sure why patrick would have told fred that. i have never seen that before.

fred is worthless imo and I FOUND his post to the new lady on the board to be unacceptable.

i stand by the descision i made on this matter. sorry you disagree.

hamneggs · May 28, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR>Originally posted by RPM:
ham,

im not sure why patrick would have told fred that. i have never seen that before.

fred is worthless imo and I FOUND his post to the new lady on the board to be unacceptable.

i stand by the descision i made on this matter. sorry you disagree.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

RPM, he gambles a lot more for a lot bigger stakes than 99.9% of the people on this site.

His opinions are strong, harsh and often directed "at" people, but he is good for The Rx as many would agree. Good Luck

RPM · May 28, 2003

yes i can see why someone who wishes cancer on shrinks wife would be good for the site. whatever ham.

hamneggs · May 28, 2003

RPM, it was a fresh slate with Pat aboard

You miss that part?

RPM · May 28, 2003

a fresh slate is fine. meanwhile he insults and talks rudely to a new female poster. it was uncalled for. that combined with his post to uncle b was enough for me to say goodbye.

besides, for the life of me, i have no idea why ANYONE would give him a fresh start here.

somethings are unforgivable.

panther · May 28, 2003

rpm

if it was a fresh slate. this guy said nothing to get banned for,

if you are banning a guy for saying he wants to see a girls rack and muff.I would have been banned in my first 3 months

have to agree with hammy

my 2 cents

panther

panther · May 28, 2003

1 other ??? if he was banned . and a worthless fvck, why was he let back in ???

panther

UncleButternutts · May 28, 2003

Panther, he wasn't "let back in".. He just created yet another username to post his trash under.

Sorry hammy, he is ban on site for me too.

I believe the guy was given 16 or 17 chances, and he made us regret every one of them.

As far as him being "good for the site", i haven't seen any hint of it.

hamneggs · May 28, 2003

my understanding was that Pat welcomed back old and new posters

it also sounded like a "this day forward" clean slate

banning may have been warranted in the past

BUT not here

bartybet · May 28, 2003

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote">quote:<HR> posted May 28, 2003 07:48 PM
my understanding was that Pat welcomed back old and new posters

it also sounded like a "this day forward" clean slate

banning may have been warranted in the past

BUT not here

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

i thought pat was named a mod around here....does he know he is the new owner of the rx?

at least in hammys eyes

panther · May 28, 2003

uncle b

thanks for clearing that up for me.

I dont think anyone should be banned for wanting tits

and muff

panther

panther · May 28, 2003

hammy

what has this guy got to offer???

panther

hamneggs · May 28, 2003

panther, i will pull down some posts

Dante · May 28, 2003

HAmmy...did you see this post that UB caught before your thread was started ..was this after the supposed clean slate??

S&G
Mildly Insane
posted May 28, 2003 01:29 PM
Players--
There are just a couple of factors that have to be taken into consideration if you need to truly evaluate the integrity of Big Bet Poker.
1. They have had numerous inquiries about their "wordy" and confusing policies with regard to bonuses and ALL HAVE FALLEN UPON DEAL EARS.
2. They have an entire folder dedicated solely to their sorry asses as well as the blessing of the mods to say and/or write anything without accountability. NOW LET'S SEE THE LAST TIME I CAN RECALL AN ENTIRE FOLDER DEDICATED TO A BOOK WAS.....OH YEAH NAB!!!! YEAH THE OLD NAB FOLDER THAT WAS A "SHRINK SHRINE" TO ONE OF THE MOST FU(KED UP BOOKS TO GRACE THE FRONT PAGE OF THE RX. WELL AT LEAST THERE IS A PRECEDENCE HERE TO CITE.
3. And the MOST OBVIOUS AND IMPORTANT FACTOR WHEN DETERMINING WHY BIG BET POKER WILL TURN OUT TO BE A "F-ME IN THE ASS WHEN IT'S ALL OVER" SITE IS:
We'd like to thank Big Bet Poker for sponsoring this new forum, and for those gamblers who are interested in POKER, this is the place for you!
THE SHRINK
-----------------
When that welcome wagon is rolled out by Kenny there is trouble on the horizon.
Now now all you mods who are running to daddy's defense dismissing another attack on your beloved boss. Well, after you get up from being on your knees all day take a look at a remark made. You may want to remove Kenny's cock out of your mouths before you read this cause you might gag:
Shrink's quote:
We are proud to be featuring WagersParadise sports book from Costa Rica as an additional 'out' for gamblers to try. They are affiliated with Buckeye Sports book, a company that is already familiar to many gamblers.
Follow up quote by yours truly:
Shrink-
If this books turns out to be a stiff will you start a forum dedicated solely to helping people out with Wagersparadise? With the promise of not bad mouthing a book that has just f-ed people over?
RESOLUTION:
Shrinkscum never came in after the initial post to refute and/or add anything else besides the initial acknowledgment that he was PAID BY ANOTHER SCAM BOOK TO ADVERTISE AND WITH THAT YOU'RE ALL ON YOUR OWN (just reading between the lines) Turns out the Miss Cleo is not the only one who can predict the future. Wagersparadise was welcomed by the RX, ass kissed by the mods at the RX, coddled by the RX and FINALLY FU(KED posters out of money at the RX.
Don't worry if you missed this post it will run like the Matrix-reloaded on opening weekend. ALL DAY ALL NIGHT ON 8 SCREENS DAILY. So if ya missed it there will be another showing right around the corner.
Make your plans early for Vegas-All are welcome!!!!!!!

this does not look like a clean slate....I tried about 6mos ago to reason with fred and even lobbied for him to have his old name back...in the BR if he would just post an occasional nice post....he can't the guy is sick